Is trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) rising or falling in Botswana?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Botswana data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) in Botswana

Name: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) in Botswana
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Botswana: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) was 99.03 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

99.03

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

47th

of 188 countries

All-time high

99.03

in 2014

All-time low

99.03

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) in Botswana, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) in Botswana is 99.03, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Botswana 47th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Botswana

46 Namibia 99.06 compare
48 Japan 99.02 compare
49 Belarus 98.95 compare
50 Eswatini 98.93 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Botswana

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 41.92 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0825 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.003 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1582 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.17 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 1,922 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 11.23 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.8077 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 1,899 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0424 (2050)

All data for Botswana →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) in Botswana?: Trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) in Botswana was 99.03 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in Botswana?: The highest recorded value was 99.03 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in Botswana?: The lowest recorded value was 99.03 in 2014.
How does Botswana rank for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?: Botswana ranks 47th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) rising or falling in Botswana?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Botswana data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.