How does Bhutan rank for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?

Bhutan ranks 61st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) rising or falling in Bhutan?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Bhutan data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) in Bhutan

Name: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) in Bhutan
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Bhutan: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) was 97.07 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

97.07

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

61st

of 188 countries

All-time high

97.07

in 2014

All-time low

97.07

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) in Bhutan, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) in Bhutan stood at 97.07. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Bhutan ranks 61st of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Bhutan

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Bhutan

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0153 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.1585 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 22.21 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 56.9 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 155.85 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0909 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.1192 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3489 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 4.06 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 19.25 (2050)

All data for Bhutan →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) in Bhutan?: Trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) in Bhutan was 97.07 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in Bhutan?: The highest recorded value was 97.07 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in Bhutan?: The lowest recorded value was 97.07 in 2014.
How does Bhutan rank for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?: Bhutan ranks 61st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) rising or falling in Bhutan?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Bhutan data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.