Is trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) rising or falling in Bahamas?

Over the last ten years it is up 25.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this Bahamas data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) in Bahamas

Name: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) in Bahamas
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Bahamas: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) was 97.91 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)

97.91

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

56th

of 188 countries

All-time high

97.91

in 2015

All-time low

77.82

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) in Bahamas, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Bahamas recorded 97.91 for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is up 25.8% over ten years.

That places Bahamas 56th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Bahamas

54 Kazakhstan 98.12 compare
54 Montenegro 98.12 compare
56 Panama 97.91 compare
58 Malaysia 97.7 compare
59 Oman 97.49 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Bahamas

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0325 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 13.04 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 13.08 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 16.02 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 20.53 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.1503 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 5.86 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0054 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 0.2514 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 0.2091 (2050)

All data for Bahamas →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) in Bahamas?: Trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) in Bahamas was 97.91 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in Bahamas?: The highest recorded value was 97.91 in 2015.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in Bahamas?: The lowest recorded value was 77.82 in 2014.
How does Bahamas rank for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?: Bahamas ranks 56th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) rising or falling in Bahamas?: Over the last ten years it is up 25.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Bahamas data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.