Is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Uruguay?

Over the last ten years it is up 2.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Uruguay data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Uruguay

Name: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Uruguay
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Uruguay: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 was 98.21 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

98.21

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

44th

of 188 countries

All-time high

98.21

in 2017

All-time low

95.7

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Uruguay, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Uruguay recorded 98.21 for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.6% over ten years.

Uruguay ranks 44th of 188 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Uruguay

41 Bhutan 98.57 compare
42 Namibia 98.39 compare
43 Bosnia and Herzegovina 98.23 compare
44 South Korea 98.21 compare
44 Palestine 98.21 compare
47 Turkey 98.03 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Uruguay

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2999 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.87 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.98 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3685 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 6.98 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.01 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2195 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 24.48 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 33.62 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.01 (2050)

All data for Uruguay →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Uruguay?: Trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Uruguay was 98.21 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Uruguay?: The highest recorded value was 98.21 in 2017.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Uruguay?: The lowest recorded value was 95.7 in 2014.
How does Uruguay rank for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1?: Uruguay ranks 44th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Uruguay?: Over the last ten years it is up 2.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Uruguay data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.