Is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Lebanon?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Lebanon data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Lebanon

Name: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Lebanon
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Lebanon: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 was 35.84 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

35.84

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

171st

of 188 countries

All-time high

35.84

in 2014

All-time low

35.84

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Lebanon, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Lebanon recorded 35.84 for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

That places Lebanon 171st out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Lebanon

168 Burundi 45.05 compare
169 Togo 40.14 compare
170 South Sudan 36.2 compare
172 Kenya 30.82 compare
173 Algeria 25.24 compare
174 Bangladesh 22.94 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Lebanon

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3495 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.3495 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1892 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0413 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0181 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 36.73 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 251.2 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 41.73 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.25 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils 423.02 (2050)

All data for Lebanon →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Lebanon?: Trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Lebanon was 35.84 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Lebanon?: The highest recorded value was 35.84 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Lebanon?: The lowest recorded value was 35.84 in 2014.
How does Lebanon rank for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1?: Lebanon ranks 171st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Lebanon?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Lebanon data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.