Is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Israel?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Israel data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Israel

Name: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Israel
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Israel: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 was 77.42 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

77.42

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

104th

of 188 countries

All-time high

77.42

in 2014

All-time low

77.42

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Israel, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Israel is 77.42, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Israel ranks 104th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Israel

101 Argentina 78.85 compare
101 Cape Verde 78.85 compare
103 Antigua and Barbuda 78.38 compare
105 India 76.95 compare
106 Kyrgyzstan 75.66 compare
107 Mauritania 75.63 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Israel

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.5 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2959 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0025 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.104 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1891 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0882 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.719 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0191 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 473.04 (2050)

All data for Israel →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Israel?: Trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Israel was 77.42 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Israel?: The highest recorded value was 77.42 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Israel?: The lowest recorded value was 77.42 in 2014.
How does Israel rank for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1?: Israel ranks 104th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Israel?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Israel data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.