Is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Egypt?

Over the last ten years it is down 75.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.

Where does this Egypt data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Egypt

Name: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Egypt
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Egypt: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 was 14.34 in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)

14.34

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

178th

of 188 countries

All-time high

57.35

in 2014

All-time low

14.34

in 2016

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Egypt, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Egypt is 14.34, measured in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 75.0% over ten years.

Egypt ranks 178th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Egypt

175 Liberia 22.58 compare
176 Zimbabwe 18.76 compare
177 Myanmar 17.92 compare
178 Equatorial Guinea 14.34 compare
180 Nigeria 13.72 compare
181 Chad 13.62 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Egypt

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2851 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.23 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16.05 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 16.05 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.956 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4622 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 25.55 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 71.76 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 6.55 (2050)

All data for Egypt →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Egypt?: Trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Egypt was 14.34 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Egypt?: The highest recorded value was 57.35 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Egypt?: The lowest recorded value was 14.34 in 2016.
How does Egypt rank for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1?: Egypt ranks 178th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Egypt?: Over the last ten years it is down 75.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Egypt data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.