How does Bahamas rank for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1?

Bahamas ranks 93rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Bahamas?

Over the last ten years it is up 26.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this Bahamas data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Bahamas

Name: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Bahamas
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Bahamas: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 was 82.08 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)

82.08

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

93rd

of 188 countries

All-time high

82.08

in 2015

All-time low

64.87

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Bahamas, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Bahamas stood at 82.08. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 26.5% over ten years.

Bahamas ranks 93rd of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Bahamas

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Bahamas

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0325 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 13.04 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 13.08 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 16.02 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 20.53 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.1503 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 5.86 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0054 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 0.2514 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 0.2091 (2050)

All data for Bahamas →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Bahamas?: Trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Bahamas was 82.08 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Bahamas?: The highest recorded value was 82.08 in 2015.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Bahamas?: The lowest recorded value was 64.87 in 2014.
How does Bahamas rank for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1?: Bahamas ranks 93rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Bahamas?: Over the last ten years it is up 26.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Bahamas data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.