Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance in Papua New Guinea
Papua New Guinea: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance was 72.19 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance in Papua New Guinea, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance in Papua New Guinea is 72.19, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
That represents a change of up 64.9% on the previous year and up 64.9% over ten years.
Papua New Guinea ranks 113th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance in Papua New Guinea, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 43.79 | — |
| 2015 | 43.79 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 43.79 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 43.79 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 43.79 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 72.19 | +64.9% |
Papua New Guinea compared with similar countries
- Papua New Guinea's 72.19 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 65.09, 1.1× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Papua New Guinea's 72.19 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 80.18, 90% of the median. (28 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Papua New Guinea
- 110 Seychelles 74.77 compare
- 111 Sao Tome and Principe 73.22 compare
- 112 Jamaica 72.78 compare
- 113 Barbados 72.19 compare
- 113 Benin 72.19 compare
- 113 Central African Republic 72.19 compare
- 113 Colombia 72.19 compare
- 113 Gambia 72.19 compare
- 113 Guatemala 72.19 compare
- 113 Honduras 72.19 compare
- 113 Lebanon 72.19 compare
- 113 Maldives 72.19 compare
- 113 Mali 72.19 compare
- 113 Moldova 72.19 compare
- 113 Nicaragua 72.19 compare
- 113 Sri Lanka 72.19 compare
- 113 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 72.19 compare
- 113 Syria 72.19 compare
More reference data data for Papua New Guinea
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2042 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0498 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.3515 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0007 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3515 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6846 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.5295 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2811 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0038 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance in Papua New Guinea?
- Trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance in Papua New Guinea was 72.19 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance recorded in Papua New Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 72.19 in 2019.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance recorded in Papua New Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was 43.79 in 2014.
- How does Papua New Guinea rank for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 113th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance rising or falling in Papua New Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is up 64.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Papua New Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.