Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance in Libya

Libya: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance was 57.99 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
57.99
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
147th
of 191 countries
All-time high
57.99
in 2014
All-time low
57.99
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance in Libya, 2014–2019

02040602014201620192014: 582015: 582016: 582017: 582018: 582019: 58

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance in Libya stood at 57.99. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

That places Libya 147th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance in Libya, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Libya, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 57.99 —
2015 57.99 +0.0%
2016 57.99 +0.0%
2017 57.99 +0.0%
2018 57.99 +0.0%
2019 57.99 +0.0%

Libya compared with similar countries

  • Libya's 57.99 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 86.39, 67% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Libya's 57.99 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 72.19, 80% of the median. (23 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Libya

  1. 146 South Africa 60.35 compare
  2. 147 Kuwait 57.99 compare
  3. 147 Kyrgyzstan 57.99 compare
  4. 147 Palau 57.99 compare
  5. 147 Sierra Leone 57.99 compare
  6. 147 Vanuatu 57.99 compare
  7. 147 Palestine 57.99 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Libya

All data for Libya →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance in Libya?
Trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance in Libya was 57.99 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance recorded in Libya?
The highest recorded value was 57.99 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance recorded in Libya?
The lowest recorded value was 57.99 in 2014.
How does Libya rank for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance?
Libya ranks 147th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance rising or falling in Libya?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Libya data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance in Libya. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-time-to-export-documentary-compliance-hours-db16-20-methodology/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-time-to-export-documentary-compliance-hours-db16-20-methodology/libya/">Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance in Libya</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.