Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance in Georgia

Georgia: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance was 99.7 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
99.7
Change on year
up 0.3%
World rank
27th
of 191 countries
All-time high
99.7
in 2019
All-time low
72.19
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance in Georgia, 2014–2019

0204060801002014201620192014: 72.22015: 72.22016: 99.42017: 99.42018: 99.42019: 99.7

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance in Georgia stood at 99.7. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is up 0.3% on the previous year and up 38.1% over ten years.

Georgia ranks 27th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance in Georgia, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Georgia, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 72.19 —
2015 72.19 +0.0%
2016 99.41 +37.7%
2017 99.41 +0.0%
2018 99.41 +0.0%
2019 99.7 +0.3%

Georgia compared with similar countries

  • Georgia's 99.7 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 86.39, 1.2× the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Georgia's 99.7 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 99.56, 1.0× the median. (49 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Georgia

  1. 27 United States 99.7 compare
  2. 27 Switzerland 99.7 compare
  3. 30 Puerto Rico 99.58 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Georgia

All data for Georgia →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance in Georgia?
Trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance in Georgia was 99.7 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance recorded in Georgia?
The highest recorded value was 99.7 in 2019.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance recorded in Georgia?
The lowest recorded value was 72.19 in 2014.
How does Georgia rank for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance?
Georgia ranks 27th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance rising or falling in Georgia?
Over the last ten years it is up 38.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Georgia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance in Georgia. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-time-to-export-documentary-compliance-hours-db16-20-methodology/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-time-to-export-documentary-compliance-hours-db16-20-methodology/georgia/">Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance in Georgia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.