Is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) rising or falling in China?

Over the last ten years it is up 8.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this China data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) in China

Name: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) in China
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

China: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) was 95.49 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)

95.49

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

59th

of 188 countries

All-time high

95.49

in 2018

All-time low

88.05

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) in China, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) in China is 95.49, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is up 8.4% over ten years.

China ranks 59th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near China

56 Australia 96.45 compare
56 Oman 96.45 compare
58 Mexico 95.86 compare
60 Bhutan 95.27 compare
60 Mauritius 95.27 compare
62 El Salvador 95.07 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for China

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 49.4 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 303.29 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 75.5 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 966.05 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Crop Residues 27,128 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 275.23 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues 5,377 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 966.05 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils 336,373 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 116.22 (2050)

All data for China →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) in China?: Trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) in China was 95.49 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in China?: The highest recorded value was 95.49 in 2018.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in China?: The lowest recorded value was 88.05 in 2014.
How does China rank for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?: China ranks 59th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) rising or falling in China?: Over the last ten years it is up 8.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this China data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.