Is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) rising or falling in Bahamas?

Over the last ten years it is up 43.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this Bahamas data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) in Bahamas

Name: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) in Bahamas
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Bahamas: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) was 93.49 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)

93.49

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

71st

of 188 countries

All-time high

93.49

in 2015

All-time low

65.09

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) in Bahamas, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Bahamas recorded 93.49 for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of up 43.6% over ten years.

Bahamas ranks 71st of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Bahamas

69 Thailand 93.92 compare
70 India 93.7 compare
71 Brazil 93.49 compare
71 Dominica 93.49 compare
71 Suriname 93.49 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Bahamas

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0325 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 13.04 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 13.08 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 16.02 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 20.53 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.1503 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 5.86 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0054 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 0.2514 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 0.2091 (2050)

All data for Bahamas →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) in Bahamas?: Trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) in Bahamas was 93.49 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in Bahamas?: The highest recorded value was 93.49 in 2015.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in Bahamas?: The lowest recorded value was 65.09 in 2014.
How does Bahamas rank for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?: Bahamas ranks 71st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) rising or falling in Bahamas?: Over the last ten years it is up 43.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Bahamas data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.