Is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) rising or falling in Argentina?

Over the last ten years it is up 1.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Argentina data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) in Argentina

Name: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) in Argentina
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Argentina: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) was 85.8 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

85.8

Change on year

up 1.4%

World rank

94th

of 188 countries

All-time high

85.8

in 2019

All-time low

84.62

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) in Argentina, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) in Argentina is 85.8, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is up 1.4% on the previous year and up 1.4% over ten years.

Argentina ranks 94th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Argentina

95 Russia 85.56 compare
96 Morocco 85.43 compare
97 Micronesia (country) 85.21 compare
97 Senegal 85.21 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Argentina

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.56 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 20.99 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 37.41 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 5.76 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 37.41 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 5.24 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.69 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 111.77 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 187.7 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 31.35 (2050)

All data for Argentina →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) in Argentina?: Trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) in Argentina was 85.8 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in Argentina?: The highest recorded value was 85.8 in 2019.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in Argentina?: The lowest recorded value was 84.62 in 2014.
How does Argentina rank for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?: Argentina ranks 94th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) rising or falling in Argentina?: Over the last ten years it is up 1.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Argentina data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.