How does Zimbabwe rank for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1?

Zimbabwe ranks 148th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Zimbabwe?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Zimbabwe

Name: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Zimbabwe
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 was 45.07 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

45.07

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

148th

of 188 countries

All-time high

45.07

in 2014

All-time low

45.07

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Zimbabwe, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Zimbabwe stood at 45.07. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

That places Zimbabwe 148th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

147 Iraq 47.44 compare
149 South Africa 42.77 compare
150 Belize 40.25 compare
150 Ecuador 40.25 compare
150 Gabon 40.25 compare
150 Lebanon 40.25 compare
150 Tanzania 40.25 compare
150 East Timor 40.25 compare
150 Uruguay 40.25 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Zimbabwe

Summer temperature anomalies 0.8086 °C (2026)
Spring temperature anomalies -0.1903 °C (2026)
Temperature anomalies by month -0.5886 °C (2026)
Exchange rate, new LCU per USD extended backward, period average 60,892 (2025)
Exchange rate, old LCU per USD extended forward, period average 60,892 (2025)
Official exchange rate, LCU per USD, period average 60,892 (2025)
Men's universal right to vote 1 (2025)
Elected parliament 1 (2025)
Competitive elections 0 (2025)
Chief executive of the government is elected 1 (2025)

All data for Zimbabwe →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Zimbabwe?: Trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Zimbabwe was 45.07 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Zimbabwe?: The highest recorded value was 45.07 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Zimbabwe?: The lowest recorded value was 45.07 in 2014.
How does Zimbabwe rank for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1?: Zimbabwe ranks 148th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Zimbabwe?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.