Is trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Tunisia?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Tunisia data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Tunisia

Name: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Tunisia
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Tunisia: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 was 93.08 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

93.08

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

48th

of 188 countries

All-time high

93.08

in 2014

All-time low

93.08

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Tunisia, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Tunisia recorded 93.08 for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

That places Tunisia 48th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Tunisia

45 Singapore 94.34 compare
46 Nepal 93.71 compare
47 Azerbaijan 93.12 compare
49 South Korea 92.22 compare
50 Kenya 90.88 compare
51 Dominican Republic 90.57 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Tunisia

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 5.29 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 125.93 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 6.83 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4961 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.07 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1849 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7169 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.38 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 48.99 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 2,139 (2050)

All data for Tunisia →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Tunisia?: Trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Tunisia was 93.08 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Tunisia?: The highest recorded value was 93.08 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Tunisia?: The lowest recorded value was 93.08 in 2014.
How does Tunisia rank for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1?: Tunisia ranks 48th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Tunisia?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Tunisia data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.