Is trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Kuwait?

Over the last ten years it is up 23.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this Kuwait data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Kuwait

Name: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Kuwait
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Kuwait: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 was 47.8 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)

47.8

Change on year

up 18.8%

World rank

144th

of 188 countries

All-time high

47.8

in 2019

All-time low

38.74

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Kuwait, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Kuwait recorded 47.8 for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is up 18.8% on the previous year and up 23.4% over ten years.

Kuwait ranks 144th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Kuwait

141 Seychelles 49.06 compare
142 Sao Tome and Principe 48.35 compare
143 Rwanda 48.22 compare
144 Suriname 47.8 compare
144 Syria 47.8 compare
147 Iraq 47.44 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Kuwait

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.385 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2165 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation 131.78 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Crop Residues 1.39 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.24 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0876 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.47 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils 491.73 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 491.73 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 405.04 (2050)

All data for Kuwait →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Kuwait?: Trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Kuwait was 47.8 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Kuwait?: The highest recorded value was 47.8 in 2019.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Kuwait?: The lowest recorded value was 38.74 in 2014.
How does Kuwait rank for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1?: Kuwait ranks 144th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Kuwait?: Over the last ten years it is up 23.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Kuwait data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.