How does Georgia rank for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1?

Georgia ranks 34th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Georgia?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Georgia data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Georgia

Name: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Georgia
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Georgia: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 was 96.86 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

96.86

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

34th

of 188 countries

All-time high

96.86

in 2014

All-time low

96.86

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Georgia, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Georgia stood at 96.86. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Georgia ranks 34th of 188 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Georgia

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Georgia

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.097 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.684 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.01 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0278 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.01 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3252 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2904 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.69 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.28 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1515 (2050)

All data for Georgia →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Georgia?: Trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Georgia was 96.86 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Georgia?: The highest recorded value was 96.86 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Georgia?: The lowest recorded value was 96.86 in 2014.
How does Georgia rank for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1?: Georgia ranks 34th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Georgia?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Georgia data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.