How does Cote d'Ivoire rank for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1?

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 178th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Where does this Cote d'Ivoire data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Cote d'Ivoire

Name: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Cote d'Ivoire
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Cote d'Ivoire: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 was 0 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

World rank

178th

of 188 countries

All-time high

in 2014

All-time low

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Cote d'Ivoire, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Cote d'Ivoire stood at 0. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 178th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Cote d'Ivoire

176 Myanmar 11.53 compare
177 South Sudan 8.81 compare
178 Bangladesh 0 compare
178 Angola 0 compare
178 Cameroon 0 compare
178 Democratic Republic of Congo 0 compare
178 Congo 0 compare
178 Eritrea 0 compare
178 Liberia 0 compare
178 Sudan 0 compare
178 Venezuela 0 compare
178 Yemen 0 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Cote d'Ivoire

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.2 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2383 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1744 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.93 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.93 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 6,119 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 3.05 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 188.03 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 3,515 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 2,621 (2050)

All data for Cote d'Ivoire →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Cote d'Ivoire?: Trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Cote d'Ivoire was 0 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Cote d'Ivoire?: The highest recorded value was 0 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Cote d'Ivoire?: The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2014.
How does Cote d'Ivoire rank for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1?: Cote d'Ivoire ranks 178th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Cote d'Ivoire data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.