How does Suriname rank for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?

Suriname ranks 86th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Suriname?

Over the last ten years it is up 4.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Suriname

Name: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Suriname
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Suriname: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 75.02 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

75.02

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

86th

of 188 countries

All-time high

78.03

in 2015

All-time low

72.04

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Suriname, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score in Suriname is 75.02, measured in 2019.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.1% over ten years.

That places Suriname 86th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Suriname

83 Nicaragua 76.99 compare
84 Haiti 76.9 compare
85 Saudi Arabia 75.98 compare
87 Rwanda 74.98 compare
88 Kyrgyzstan 74.72 compare
89 Tunisia 74.63 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Suriname

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 28.83 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0324 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.6572 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 147.68 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 15.75 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0109 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.1239 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 56.48 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 13.43 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1088 (2050)

All data for Suriname →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score in Suriname?: Trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score in Suriname was 75.02 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Suriname?: The highest recorded value was 78.03 in 2015.
What is the lowest trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Suriname?: The lowest recorded value was 72.04 in 2014.
How does Suriname rank for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?: Suriname ranks 86th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Suriname?: Over the last ten years it is up 4.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Suriname data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.