Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Costa Rica

Costa Rica: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) was 87.54 in 2014. β–² Rising

Latest (2014)
87.54
Change on year
up 1.2%
World rank
61st
of 183 countries
All-time high
87.54
in 2014
All-time low
67.12
in 2005
Years of data
10
2005–2014

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Costa Rica, 2005–2014

0204060802005200920142005: 67.12006: 70.92007: 74.42008: 74.82009: 78.32010: 80.52011: 82.42012: 86.72013: 86.52014: 87.5

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Costa Rica is 87.54, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.

The figure is up 1.2% on the previous year and up 30.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Costa Rica peaked at 87.54 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 67.12, in 2005.

Costa Rica ranks 61st of 183 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 73.11 67.12 78.29 5
2010s 84.71 80.48 87.54 5

Countries ranked near Costa Rica

  1. 58 Germany 87.9 compare
  2. 58 Qatar 87.9 compare
  3. 58 United Kingdom 87.9 compare
  4. 62 Ireland 86.64 compare
  5. 63 Greece 86.39 compare
  6. 64 Norway 86.3 compare

See the full ranking of 183 places β†’

More reference data data for Costa Rica

All data for Costa Rica β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Costa Rica?
Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Costa Rica was 87.54 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Costa Rica?
The highest recorded value was 87.54 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Costa Rica?
The lowest recorded value was 67.12 in 2005.
How does Costa Rica rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
Costa Rica ranks 61st out of 183 countries with data for 2014.
Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) rising or falling in Costa Rica?
Over the last ten years it is up 30.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Costa Rica. Statizoid. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-db06-15-methodology-score/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-db06-15-methodology-score/costa-rica/">Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Costa Rica</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.