Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Antigua and Barbuda
Antigua and Barbuda: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) was 100 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▼ Falling
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Antigua and Barbuda, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
Antigua and Barbuda recorded 100 DB16-20 methodology for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.
That represents a change of down 24.2% over ten years.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 85th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Countries ranked near Antigua and Barbuda
- 82 Benin 110 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 83 Japan 107 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 84 Brazil 106.94 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 85 India 100 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 85 United States 100 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 85 Mexico 100 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 85 Armenia, Republic of 100 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 85 Australia 100 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 85 Djibouti 100 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 85 Palau, Republic of 100 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 85 San Marino, Republic of 100 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Antigua and Barbuda
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0042 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0111 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0153 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0153 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0141 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0035 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0493 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0671 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Antigua and Barbuda?
- Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Antigua and Barbuda was 100 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Antigua and Barbuda?
- The highest recorded value was 131.94 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Antigua and Barbuda?
- The lowest recorded value was 100 DB16-20 methodology in 2016.
- How does Antigua and Barbuda rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 85th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) rising or falling in Antigua and Barbuda?
- Over the last ten years it is down 24.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Antigua and Barbuda data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.