Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Ukraine?

Over the last ten years it is up 10.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this Ukraine data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Ukraine

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Ukraine
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Ukraine: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 76.86 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)

76.86

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

129th

of 188 countries

All-time high

76.86

in 2018

All-time low

69.71

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Ukraine, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Ukraine recorded 76.86 for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 10.2% over ten years.

That places Ukraine 129th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Ukraine

126 Gambia 78.3 compare
127 Russia 78.21 compare
128 Malawi 76.92 compare
130 Canada 76.79 compare
131 Indonesia 76.51 compare
132 Mauritius 76.34 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Ukraine

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.72 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.8321 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.98 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.92 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 8.98 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 9.11 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.76 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.97 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 43.91 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 10.47 (2050)

All data for Ukraine →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Ukraine?: Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Ukraine was 76.86 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Ukraine?: The highest recorded value was 76.86 in 2018.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Ukraine?: The lowest recorded value was 69.71 in 2014.
How does Ukraine rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Ukraine ranks 129th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Ukraine?: Over the last ten years it is up 10.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Ukraine data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.