Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Tonga?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Tonga data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Tonga

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Tonga
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Tonga: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 78.93 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

78.93

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

121st

of 188 countries

All-time high

78.93

in 2014

All-time low

78.93

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Tonga, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Tonga recorded 78.93 for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Tonga ranks 121st of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Tonga

118 Lebanon 80.71 compare
118 Paraguay 80.71 compare
120 Tunisia 79.37 compare
122 Madagascar 78.64 compare
123 Barbados 78.57 compare
123 Haiti 78.57 compare
123 Zimbabwe 78.57 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Tonga

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0105 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0197 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0197 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0092 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 21.17 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0601 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils 21.17 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0248 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0601 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 2.55 (2050)

All data for Tonga →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Tonga?: Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Tonga was 78.93 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Tonga?: The highest recorded value was 78.93 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Tonga?: The lowest recorded value was 78.93 in 2014.
How does Tonga rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Tonga ranks 121st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Tonga?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Tonga data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.