Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Serbia?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Serbia data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Serbia

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Serbia
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Serbia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 95 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

36th

of 188 countries

All-time high

in 2014

All-time low

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Serbia, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Serbia is 95, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Serbia ranks 36th of 188 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Serbia

33 South Korea 96.18 compare
34 Switzerland 96.14 compare
35 Bolivia 95.71 compare
37 Guatemala 94.71 compare
38 Dominican Republic 94.29 compare
38 Singapore 94.29 compare
38 Suriname 94.29 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Serbia

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6055 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3321 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.36 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3467 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.36 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.03 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.29 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.44 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 15.2 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.89 (2050)

All data for Serbia →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Serbia?: Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Serbia was 95 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Serbia?: The highest recorded value was 95 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Serbia?: The lowest recorded value was 95 in 2014.
How does Serbia rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Serbia ranks 36th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Serbia?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Serbia data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.