Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Latvia
Latvia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) was 100 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Latest (2019)
100
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 191 countries
All-time high
100
in 2014
All-time low
100
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Latvia, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Latvia recorded 100 for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Latvia ranks 1st of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Latvia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 100 | — |
| 2015 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 100 | +0.0% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 100 is above the median for high income countries, which is 93.57, 1.1× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 100 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 100, 1.0× the median. (49 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 1 Austria 100 compare
- 1 Belarus 100 compare
- 1 Belgium 100 compare
- 1 Bulgaria 100 compare
- 1 Croatia 100 compare
- 1 Czechia 100 compare
- 1 Denmark 100 compare
- 1 Estonia 100 compare
- 1 Finland 100 compare
- 1 France 100 compare
- 1 Germany 100 compare
- 1 Greece 100 compare
- 1 Hungary 100 compare
- 1 Iceland 100 compare
- 1 Italy 100 compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 100 compare
- 1 Lithuania 100 compare
- 1 Luxembourg 100 compare
- 1 Malta 100 compare
- 1 Netherlands 100 compare
- 1 Norway 100 compare
- 1 Poland 100 compare
- 1 Portugal 100 compare
- 1 Romania 100 compare
- 1 Slovakia 100 compare
- 1 Slovenia 100 compare
- 1 Spain 100 compare
- 1 Sweden 100 compare
- 1 United Kingdom 100 compare
More reference data data for Latvia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.128 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0503 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0673 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4291 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2986 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2679 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3666 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Latvia?
- Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Latvia was 100 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 100 in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 100 in 2014.
- How does Latvia rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Latvia ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.