Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Guinea?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Guinea data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Guinea

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Guinea
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 74.29 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

74.29

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

135th

of 188 countries

All-time high

74.29

in 2014

All-time low

74.29

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Guinea, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Guinea recorded 74.29 for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Guinea ranks 135th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Guinea

132 Mauritius 76.34 compare
133 Gabon 75.71 compare
134 Zambia 75 compare
136 Maldives 74.22 compare
137 Vanuatu 73.93 compare
137 Vietnam 73.93 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Guinea

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.111 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 9.39 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 3,544 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2242 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 415.93 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.37 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.56 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 24.94 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.05 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16 (2050)

All data for Guinea →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Guinea?: Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Guinea was 74.29 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Guinea?: The highest recorded value was 74.29 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Guinea?: The lowest recorded value was 74.29 in 2014.
How does Guinea rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Guinea ranks 135th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Guinea?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Guinea data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.