Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Saint Lucia
Saint Lucia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 842.05 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Saint Lucia, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Saint Lucia stood at 842.05 DB16-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Saint Lucia ranks 25th of 189 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Saint Lucia, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 842.05 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 842.05 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 842.05 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 842.05 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 842.05 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 842.05 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Saint Lucia compared with similar countries
- Saint Lucia's 842.05 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 374 DB16-20 methodology, 2.3× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Saint Lucia's 842.05 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 540 DB16-20 methodology, 1.6× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Saint Lucia
More reference data data for Saint Lucia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0062 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0081 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0143 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (1979)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0143 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0208 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0131 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0405 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0745 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (1979)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Saint Lucia?
- Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Saint Lucia was 842.05 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Saint Lucia?
- The highest recorded value was 842.05 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Saint Lucia?
- The lowest recorded value was 842.05 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- How does Saint Lucia rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Saint Lucia ranks 25th out of 189 countries with data for 2019.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Saint Lucia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Saint Lucia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The cost for border compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the import shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a technical standard inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.