Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Serbia
Serbia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 52 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Serbia, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Serbia is 52 DB16-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Serbia ranks 158th of 189 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Serbia, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 52 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 52 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 52 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 52 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 52 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 52 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Serbia compared with similar countries
- Serbia's 52 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 374 DB16-20 methodology, 14% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Serbia
More reference data data for Serbia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3321 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3467 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 15.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.89 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Serbia?
- Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Serbia was 52 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 52 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 52 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- How does Serbia rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Serbia ranks 158th out of 189 countries with data for 2019.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The cost for border compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the import shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a technical standard inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.