Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Sao Tome and Principe
Sao Tome and Principe: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 406 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Sao Tome and Principe, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
Sao Tome and Principe recorded 406 DB16-20 methodology for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 85th of 189 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Sao Tome and Principe, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 406 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 406 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 406 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 406 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 406 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 406 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Sao Tome and Principe
More reference data data for Sao Tome and Principe
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0038 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.006 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0003 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0126 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.014 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0319 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0601 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0015 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Sao Tome and Principe?
- Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Sao Tome and Principe was 406 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?
- The highest recorded value was 406 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?
- The lowest recorded value was 406 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- How does Sao Tome and Principe rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 85th out of 189 countries with data for 2019.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Sao Tome and Principe?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Sao Tome and Principe data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The cost for border compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the import shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a technical standard inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.