Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Australia
Australia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 539 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Australia, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
Australia recorded 539 DB16-20 methodology for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.7% over ten years.
That places Australia 68th out of 189 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Australia, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 525 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 525 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 525 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 525 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 539 DB16-20 methodology | +2.7% |
| 2019 | 539 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Australia compared with similar countries
- Australia's 539 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for high income countries, which is 225 DB16-20 methodology, 2.4× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Australia's 539 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 348.25 DB16-20 methodology, 1.5× the median. (28 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Australia
- 65 Colombia 545 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 65 Mali 545 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 67 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 540 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 69 Russia 520 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 70 Costa Rica 500 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 70 Paraguay 500 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 70 Uruguay 500 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Australia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.21 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 28.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 38.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 38.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 6.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 118.71 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 170.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 13.9 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Australia?
- Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Australia was 539 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Australia?
- The highest recorded value was 539 DB16-20 methodology in 2018.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Australia?
- The lowest recorded value was 525 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- How does Australia rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Australia ranks 68th out of 189 countries with data for 2019.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Australia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Australia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The cost for border compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the import shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a technical standard inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.