Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Vanuatu?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Vanuatu data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Vanuatu

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Vanuatu
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Vanuatu: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 43.28 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

43.28

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

147th

of 188 countries

All-time high

43.28

in 2014

All-time low

43.28

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Vanuatu, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Vanuatu is 43.28, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Vanuatu ranks 147th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Vanuatu

144 Suriname 45.17 compare
145 Iran 44.97 compare
146 South Africa 43.67 compare
148 Kiribati 42.92 compare
149 Belize 42.71 compare
150 Philippines 42.54 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Vanuatu

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.4612 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0994 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0819 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0174 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0001 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0994 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0658 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.5857 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation 387.78 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 490.43 (2050)

All data for Vanuatu →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Vanuatu?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Vanuatu was 43.28 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Vanuatu?: The highest recorded value was 43.28 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Vanuatu?: The lowest recorded value was 43.28 in 2014.
How does Vanuatu rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Vanuatu ranks 147th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Vanuatu?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Vanuatu data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.