Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Niger?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this Niger data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Niger

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Niger
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Niger: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 61.54 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)

61.54

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

111th

of 188 countries

All-time high

61.54

in 2014

All-time low

36.54

in 2015

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Niger, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Niger recorded 61.54 for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Niger 111th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Niger

108 Mexico 62.5 compare
109 Cote d'Ivoire 62.02 compare
110 Myanmar 61.94 compare
112 Saudi Arabia 61.29 compare
113 Honduras 59.77 compare
114 Panama 59.17 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Niger

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 9.7 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.57 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 9.7 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2425 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.66 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5706 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 2.09 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 11,242 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 822.42 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 32.72 (2050)

All data for Niger →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Niger?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Niger was 61.54 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Niger?: The highest recorded value was 61.54 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Niger?: The lowest recorded value was 36.54 in 2015.
How does Niger rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Niger ranks 111th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Niger?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Niger data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.