Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Kyrgyzstan

Kyrgyzstan: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 58.41 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
58.41
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
116th
of 190 countries
All-time high
58.41
in 2018
All-time low
57.38
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Kyrgyzstan, 2014–2019

02040602014201620192014: 57.42015: 57.42016: 57.42017: 57.42018: 58.42019: 58.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Kyrgyzstan recorded 58.41 for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of up 1.8% over ten years.

That places Kyrgyzstan 116th out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Kyrgyzstan, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Kyrgyzstan, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 57.38
2015 57.38 +0.0%
2016 57.38 +0.0%
2017 57.38 +0.0%
2018 58.41 +1.8%
2019 58.41 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan

  1. 113 Saudi Arabia 61.29 compare
  2. 114 Honduras 59.77 compare
  3. 115 Panama 59.17 compare
  4. 117 Costa Rica 58.33 compare
  5. 117 Paraguay 58.33 compare
  6. 117 Uruguay 58.33 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Kyrgyzstan

All data for Kyrgyzstan →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Kyrgyzstan?
Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Kyrgyzstan was 58.41 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
The highest recorded value was 58.41 in 2018.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
The lowest recorded value was 57.38 in 2014.
How does Kyrgyzstan rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 116th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
Over the last ten years it is up 1.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Kyrgyzstan. Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/kyrgyz-republic/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Kyrgyzstan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.