Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Gabon

Gabon: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 0 in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
0
World rank
180th
of 191 countries
All-time high
3.96
in 2014
All-time low
0
in 2016
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Gabon, 2014–2019

012342014201620192014: 42015: 42016: 02017: 02018: 02019: 0

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Gabon stood at 0. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is down 100.0% over ten years.

Gabon ranks 180th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Gabon, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Gabon, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 3.96 —
2015 3.96 +0.0%
2016 0 -100.0%
2017 0 —
2018 0 —
2019 0 —

Gabon compared with similar countries

  • Gabon's 0 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 68.83. (56 countries reporting)
  • Gabon's 0 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 50.73. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Gabon

  1. 177 Djibouti 12.08 compare
  2. 178 Nigeria 10.27 compare
  3. 179 Sudan 8.96 compare
  4. 180 Argentina 0
  5. 180 Bahamas 0
  6. 180 Barbados 0
  7. 180 Cameroon 0
  8. 180 Democratic Republic of Congo 0
  9. 180 Congo 0
  10. 180 Eritrea 0
  11. 180 Grenada 0
  12. 180 Tanzania 0
  13. 180 Venezuela 0
  14. 180 Yemen 0

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Gabon

All data for Gabon →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Gabon?
Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Gabon was 0 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Gabon?
The highest recorded value was 3.96 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Gabon?
The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2016.
How does Gabon rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
Gabon ranks 180th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Gabon?
Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Gabon data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Gabon. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/gabon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/gabon/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Gabon</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.