Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Algeria?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Algeria data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Algeria

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Algeria
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Algeria: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 65.94 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

65.94

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

104th

of 188 countries

All-time high

65.94

in 2014

All-time low

65.94

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Algeria, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Algeria recorded 65.94 for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Algeria ranks 104th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Algeria

101 Nicaragua 66.69 compare
102 Guatemala 66.25 compare
103 Sao Tome and Principe 66.17 compare
105 East Timor 65.83 compare
106 Burundi 63.04 compare
107 Uganda 62.78 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Algeria

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 8,710 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 388.95 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 9,169 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 22.27 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8614 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0616 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 66.48 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 228.27 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.3259 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 6,004 (2050)

All data for Algeria →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Algeria?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Algeria was 65.94 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Algeria?: The highest recorded value was 65.94 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Algeria?: The lowest recorded value was 65.94 in 2014.
How does Algeria rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Algeria ranks 104th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Algeria?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Algeria data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.