Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Tonga?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Tonga data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Tonga

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Tonga
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Tonga: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 82.5 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

82.5

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

79th

of 188 countries

All-time high

82.5

in 2014

All-time low

82.5

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Tonga, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Tonga recorded 82.5 for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Tonga 79th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Tonga

76 Mongolia 84.03 compare
77 Morocco 83.25 compare
77 New Zealand 83.25 compare
79 Finland 82.5 compare
81 Saudi Arabia 81.75 compare
82 China 81.61 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Tonga

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0197 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 9.35 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0269 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0446 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0799 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 28.31 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 21.17 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.1068 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0092 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0105 (2050)

All data for Tonga →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Tonga?: Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Tonga was 82.5 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Tonga?: The highest recorded value was 82.5 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Tonga?: The lowest recorded value was 82.5 in 2014.
How does Tonga rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Tonga ranks 79th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Tonga?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Tonga data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.