Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Suriname?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Suriname data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Suriname

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Suriname
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Suriname: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 90 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

41st

of 188 countries

All-time high

in 2014

All-time low

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Suriname, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Suriname recorded 90 for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Suriname 41st out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Suriname

39 Singapore 90.75 compare
40 Niger 90.22 compare
41 Grenada 90 compare
41 Iceland 90 compare
41 Sweden 90 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Suriname

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.1239 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.1239 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0109 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0374 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0324 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1758 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 2.68 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 56.48 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 28.83 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 28.83 (2050)

All data for Suriname →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Suriname?: Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Suriname was 90 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Suriname?: The highest recorded value was 90 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Suriname?: The lowest recorded value was 90 in 2014.
How does Suriname rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Suriname ranks 41st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Suriname?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Suriname data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.