Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Qatar?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Qatar data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Qatar

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Qatar
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Qatar: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 62.5 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

62.5

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

136th

of 188 countries

All-time high

62.5

in 2014

All-time low

62.5

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Qatar, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Qatar is 62.5, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Qatar ranks 136th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Qatar

133 Vietnam 65.19 compare
134 Myanmar 65 compare
134 United Arab Emirates 65 compare
136 Azerbaijan 62.5 compare
136 Burundi 62.5 compare
139 Ghana 61.25 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Qatar

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0059 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0493 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0493 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0397 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0003 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.1603 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation 66.14 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Crop Residues 0.4403 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1349 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0088 (2050)

All data for Qatar →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Qatar?: Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Qatar was 62.5 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Qatar?: The highest recorded value was 62.5 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Qatar?: The lowest recorded value was 62.5 in 2014.
How does Qatar rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Qatar ranks 136th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Qatar?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Qatar data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.