Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Nepal?

Over the last ten years it is down 7.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.

Where does this Nepal data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Nepal

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Nepal
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Nepal: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 72.5 in 2019. ▼ Falling

Latest (2019)

72.5

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

117th

of 188 countries

All-time high

78.75

in 2014

All-time low

72.5

in 2016

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Nepal, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Nepal recorded 72.5 for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 7.9% over ten years.

That places Nepal 117th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Nepal

114 Uganda 74.53 compare
115 Guatemala 73.75 compare
116 Oman 73.21 compare
117 Kyrgyz Republic 72.5 compare
117 Rwanda 72.5 compare
120 Seychelles 71.25 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Nepal

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.14 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7853 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.14 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.5 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7753 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 18.47 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 2,990 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 211.32 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 688.89 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.33 (2050)

All data for Nepal →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Nepal?: Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Nepal was 72.5 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Nepal?: The highest recorded value was 78.75 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Nepal?: The lowest recorded value was 72.5 in 2016.
How does Nepal rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Nepal ranks 117th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Nepal?: Over the last ten years it is down 7.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Nepal data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.