How does Montenegro rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?

Montenegro ranks 31st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Montenegro?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Montenegro data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Montenegro

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Montenegro
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Montenegro: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 93.5 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

93.5

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

31st

of 188 countries

All-time high

93.5

in 2014

All-time low

93.5

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Montenegro, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Montenegro stood at 93.5. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Montenegro ranks 31st of 188 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Montenegro

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Montenegro

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 13.7 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0049 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1384 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3642 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 442.25 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 58.43 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 124.27 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 36.67 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.005 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 15.79 (2050)

All data for Montenegro →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Montenegro?: Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Montenegro was 93.5 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Montenegro?: The highest recorded value was 93.5 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Montenegro?: The lowest recorded value was 93.5 in 2014.
How does Montenegro rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Montenegro ranks 31st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Montenegro?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Montenegro data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.