Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Maldives?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Maldives data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Maldives

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Maldives
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Maldives: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 25 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

171st

of 188 countries

All-time high

in 2014

All-time low

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Maldives, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Maldives recorded 25 for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Maldives ranks 171st of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Maldives

168 Australia 34 compare
169 Tanzania 31.25 compare
170 Uzbekistan 27 compare
172 Cameroon 23.62 compare
173 Kiribati 22.5 compare
174 Liberia 17.5 compare
174 Tajikistan 17.5 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Maldives

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0001 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0033 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils 1.16 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0033 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Crop Residues 0.012 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 1.16 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 1.16 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.0004 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.0018 (2050)

All data for Maldives →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Maldives?: Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Maldives was 25 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Maldives?: The highest recorded value was 25 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Maldives?: The lowest recorded value was 25 in 2014.
How does Maldives rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Maldives ranks 171st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Maldives?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Maldives data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.