Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Germany?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Germany data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Germany

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Germany
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Germany: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 88.75 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

88.75

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

46th

of 188 countries

All-time high

88.75

in 2014

All-time low

88.75

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Germany, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Germany recorded 88.75 for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Germany ranks 46th of 188 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Germany

45 Moldova 89.03 compare
46 North Macedonia 88.75 compare
48 Nicaragua 88.33 compare
49 Haiti 88.12 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Germany

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.6 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.7 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16.93 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.94 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 16.93 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 15.41 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 9.96 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.87 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 80.38 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 10.56 (2050)

All data for Germany →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Germany?: Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Germany was 88.75 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Germany?: The highest recorded value was 88.75 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Germany?: The lowest recorded value was 88.75 in 2014.
How does Germany rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Germany ranks 46th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Germany?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Germany data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.