How does Cambodia rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?

Cambodia ranks 105th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Cambodia?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Cambodia data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Cambodia

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Cambodia
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Cambodia: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 75 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

105th

of 188 countries

All-time high

in 2014

All-time low

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Cambodia, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Cambodia stood at 75. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Cambodia ranks 105th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Cambodia

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Cambodia

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8836 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.8536 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.73 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.73 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6712 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.1968 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.85 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.81 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 17.66 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.25 (2050)

All data for Cambodia →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Cambodia?: Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Cambodia was 75 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Cambodia?: The highest recorded value was 75 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Cambodia?: The lowest recorded value was 75 in 2014.
How does Cambodia rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Cambodia ranks 105th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Cambodia?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Cambodia data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.