Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) was 10 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Kyrgyzstan, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
Kyrgyzstan recorded 10 DB16-20 methodology for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.
The figure is down 97.9% over ten years.
That places Kyrgyzstan 169th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
- 166 Palestine 51.11 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 167 Serbia 47.25 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 168 Bahrain 47.22 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Austria 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Belgium 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Croatia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Czechia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Denmark 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Estonia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 France 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Hong Kong (China) 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Hungary 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Italy 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Luxembourg 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Netherlands 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Poland 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Portugal 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Romania 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 San Marino 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Slovak Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Slovenia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Spain 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Kyrgyzstan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2833 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6193 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0857 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.8535 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4667 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Kyrgyzstan?
- Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Kyrgyzstan was 10 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 485 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 10 DB16-20 methodology in 2018.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 169th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
- Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 97.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The cost for border compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the export shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a phytosanitary inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.