Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Guatemala
Guatemala: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) was 310 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Guatemala, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
Guatemala recorded 310 DB16-20 methodology for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
That places Guatemala 99th out of 189 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 310 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 310 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 310 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 310 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 310 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 310 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Guatemala compared with similar countries
- Guatemala's 310 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 327.33 DB16-20 methodology, 95% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Guatemala's 310 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 487.5 DB16-20 methodology, 64% of the median. (33 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Guatemala
- 96 Fiji 316.67 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Botswana 316.54 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 98 Tajikistan 313.33 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 100 Ireland 305 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 101 Mauritius 302.62 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 102 Cyprus 300 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 102 Greece 300 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Guatemala
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9286 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.39 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1246 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 18.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6786 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Guatemala?
- Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Guatemala was 310 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 310 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 310 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- How does Guatemala rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Guatemala ranks 99th out of 189 countries with data for 2019.
- Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The cost for border compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the export shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a phytosanitary inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.