Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Georgia
Georgia: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) was 112 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Georgia, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
Georgia recorded 112 DB16-20 methodology for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
That places Georgia 149th out of 189 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Georgia, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 112 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 112 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 112 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 112 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 112 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 112 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Georgia compared with similar countries
- Georgia's 112 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 327.33 DB16-20 methodology, 34% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Georgia's 112 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 65 DB16-20 methodology, 1.7× the median. (49 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Georgia
- 146 El Salvador 128.33 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 147 Norway 125 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 148 Switzerland 115 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 150 Burundi 108.86 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 151 Kosovo 105 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 151 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 105 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Georgia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.097 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.684 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0278 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3252 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2904 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.28 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1515 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Georgia?
- Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Georgia was 112 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 112 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was 112 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- How does Georgia rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Georgia ranks 149th out of 189 countries with data for 2019.
- Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Georgia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The cost for border compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the export shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a phytosanitary inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.