Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Equatorial Guinea
Equatorial Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) was 760 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Equatorial Guinea, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
Equatorial Guinea recorded 760 DB16-20 methodology for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 24th of 189 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Equatorial Guinea, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 760 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 760 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 760 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 760 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 760 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 760 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Equatorial Guinea compared with similar countries
- Equatorial Guinea's 760 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 327.33 DB16-20 methodology, 2.3× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Equatorial Guinea's 760 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 490 DB16-20 methodology, 1.6× the median. (47 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea
- 21 Guinea 777.78 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 22 Australia 766 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 23 South Sudan 762.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 25 Mauritania 749 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 26 Namibia 745 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 27 Saint Lucia 717.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Equatorial Guinea
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0013 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.007 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0083 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0083 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0042 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0044 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0316 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0402 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0358 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 1.11 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Equatorial Guinea?
- Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Equatorial Guinea was 760 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 760 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was 760 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- How does Equatorial Guinea rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 24th out of 189 countries with data for 2019.
- Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Equatorial Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The cost for border compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the export shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a phytosanitary inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.