How does Zimbabwe rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?

Zimbabwe ranks 80th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Zimbabwe?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Zimbabwe

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Zimbabwe
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 73.11 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

73.11

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

80th

of 188 countries

All-time high

73.11

in 2014

All-time low

73.11

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Zimbabwe, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Zimbabwe is 73.11, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

That places Zimbabwe 80th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

77 Oman 73.68 compare
78 Central African Republic 73.58 compare
78 United Kingdom 73.58 compare
81 Pakistan 72.83 compare
82 Chile 72.64 compare
82 Vietnam 72.64 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Zimbabwe

Summer temperature anomalies 0.8086 °C (2026)
Spring temperature anomalies -0.1903 °C (2026)
Temperature anomalies by month -0.5886 °C (2026)
Exchange rate, new LCU per USD extended backward, period average 60,892 (2025)
Exchange rate, old LCU per USD extended forward, period average 60,892 (2025)
Official exchange rate, LCU per USD, period average 60,892 (2025)
Men's universal right to vote 1 (2025)
Elected parliament 1 (2025)
Competitive elections 0 (2025)
Chief executive of the government is elected 1 (2025)

All data for Zimbabwe →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Zimbabwe?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Zimbabwe was 73.11 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Zimbabwe?: The highest recorded value was 73.11 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Zimbabwe?: The lowest recorded value was 73.11 in 2014.
How does Zimbabwe rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Zimbabwe ranks 80th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Zimbabwe?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.