Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Rwanda

Rwanda: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) was 82.7 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
82.7
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
59th
of 191 countries
All-time high
82.7
in 2014
All-time low
82.7
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Rwanda, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 82.72015: 82.72016: 82.72017: 82.72018: 82.72019: 82.7

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Rwanda is 82.7, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Rwanda ranks 59th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Rwanda, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Rwanda, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 82.7 —
2015 82.7 +0.0%
2016 82.7 +0.0%
2017 82.7 +0.0%
2018 82.7 +0.0%
2019 82.7 +0.0%

Rwanda compared with similar countries

  • Rwanda's 82.7 is above the median for low income countries, which is 55.29, 1.5× the median. (24 countries reporting)
  • Rwanda's 82.7 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 53.54, 1.5× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Rwanda

  1. 56 Micronesia (country) 84.15 compare
  2. 57 Ethiopia 83.82 compare
  3. 58 United States 83.49 compare
  4. 60 South Korea 82.57 compare
  5. 61 Tonga 81.04 compare
  6. 62 Uganda 80.25 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Rwanda

All data for Rwanda →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Rwanda?
Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Rwanda was 82.7 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) recorded in Rwanda?
The highest recorded value was 82.7 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) recorded in Rwanda?
The lowest recorded value was 82.7 in 2014.
How does Rwanda rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
Rwanda ranks 59th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Rwanda?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Rwanda data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Rwanda. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/rwanda/">Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Rwanda</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.